Originally published in 1967. Many critics have claimed that existentialism has not produced any ethics, as distinct from the moralistic assertions of its individual proponents. Challenging this view, Professor Olafson demonstrates that Sartre, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty indeed worked out a powerful ethical theory and that their positions must be understood as deriving from a voluntarist concept of moral autonomy that can be traced beyond Nietzsche and Kant to certain tendencies in late-medieval thought. He demonstrates that a broad parallelism exists between developments in ethical theory...
Originally published in 1967. Many critics have claimed that existentialism has not produced any ethics, as distinct from the moralistic assertions of its individual proponents. Challenging this view, Professor Olafson demonstrates that Sartre, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty indeed worked out a powerful ethical theory and that their positions must be understood as deriving from a voluntarist concept of moral autonomy that can be traced beyond Nietzsche and Kant to certain tendencies in late-medieval thought. He demonstrates that a broad parallelism exists between developments in ethical theory among Continental philosophers of the phenomenological persuasion and the more analytically inclined philosophers of the English-speaking world.
Introduction Part I. Historical Chapter 1.The Intellectualistic Tradition Chapter 2. Theological Voluntarism Chapter 3. Philosophical Voluntarism: From Kant to Nietzsche Chapter 4. The Emergence of
Introduction Part I. Historical Chapter 1.The Intellectualistic Tradition Chapter 2. Theological Voluntarism Chapter 3. Philosophical Voluntarism: From Kant to Nietzsche Chapter 4. The Emergence of Existentialism Chapter 5. An Interpretation of Existentialism Part II. Critical Chapter 6. Action and Value Chapter 7. Freedom and Choice Chapter 8. Authenticity and Obligation Chapter 9. The Significance of Existentialism