Back to Results
Cover image of To Enlarge the Machinery of Government
Cover image of To Enlarge the Machinery of Government
Share this Title:

To Enlarge the Machinery of Government

Congressional Debates and the Growth of the American State, 1858–1891

Williamjames Hull Hoffer

Publication Date
Binding Type

How did the federal government change from the weak apparatus of the antebellum period to the large, administrative state of the Progressive Era? To Enlarge the Machinery of Government explores the daily proceedings of the U.S. House and Senate from 1858 to 1891 to find answers to this question.

Through close readings of debates centered around sponsorship, supervision, and standardization recorded in the Congressional Globe and Congressional Record during this period, Williamjames Hull Hoffer traces a critical shift in ideas that ultimately ushered in Progressive legislation: the willingness...

How did the federal government change from the weak apparatus of the antebellum period to the large, administrative state of the Progressive Era? To Enlarge the Machinery of Government explores the daily proceedings of the U.S. House and Senate from 1858 to 1891 to find answers to this question.

Through close readings of debates centered around sponsorship, supervision, and standardization recorded in the Congressional Globe and Congressional Record during this period, Williamjames Hull Hoffer traces a critical shift in ideas that ultimately ushered in Progressive legislation: the willingness of American citizens to allow, and in fact ask for, federal intervention in their daily lives. He describes this era of congressional thought as a "second state," distinct from both the minimalist approaches that came before and the Progressive state building that developed later. The "second state" era, Hoffer contends, offers valuable insight into how conceptions of American uniqueness contributed to the shape of the federal government.

Reviews

Reviews

A lively and engaging account.

Hoffer has offered a provocative challenge to the standard telling of American state development and future scholars would do well to take his argument seriously.

Ideally suited for constitutional scholars in history, political science, and law... Academic and law libraries should definitely add it to their collections.

An interesting and ambitious study. It will be a substantial contribution to the burgeoning fields of political development in political science and policy studies in history. It is sophisticated in its argument and recognizes that history is neither neat nor necessarily linear in the development of institutions and frames of reference.

About

Book Details

Publication Date
Status
Available
Trim Size
6
x
9
Pages
280
ISBN
9780801886553
Table of Contents

Introduction: "Badly in Detail but Well on the Whole": The Second State
Prologue: "The Great, Noisy, Reedy, Jarring Assembly": The Capitol, Lawyers, and Public Space
1. A "Government of States"

Introduction: "Badly in Detail but Well on the Whole": The Second State
Prologue: "The Great, Noisy, Reedy, Jarring Assembly": The Capitol, Lawyers, and Public Space
1. A "Government of States": Sponsorship and the First Debate on Land Grant Colleges, 1858–1861
2. "The Object of a Democratic Government": Sponsorship and Supervision of Agriculture and Land Grant Colleges, 1861–1863
3. "A Government of Law": Sponsoring and Supervising the Freedmen, Abandoned Lands, and Refugees, 1863–1865
4. The "Two Great Pillars" of the State: The Supervision and Standardization of Education and Law Enforcement, 1865–1876
5. "To Change the Nature of the Government": Standardizing Schooling and the Civil Service, 1876–1883
6. "What Constitutes a State": Supervising Labor and Commerce, 1883–1886
7. "A System Entirely Satisfactory to the Country": Standardizing Labor and the Courts, 1886–1891
Conclusion: "To Answer Our Purposes, It Must Be Adapted"
Acknowledgments
Notes
Essay on Sources
Index

Author Bio
Williamjames Hull Hoffer
Featured Contributor

Williamjames Hull Hoffer

Williamjames Hull Hoffer is an assistant professor of history at Seton Hall University and coeditor of The Abortion Rights Controversy in America: A Legal Reader.