Back to Results
Cover image of Losing Touch with Nature
Cover image of Losing Touch with Nature
Share this Title:

Losing Touch with Nature

Literature and the New Science in Sixteenth-Century England

Mary Thomas Crane

Publication Date
Binding Type

The rise of modern science stirred up a mix of unease and exhilaration that profoundly influenced early modern English literature.

During the scientific revolution, the dominant Aristotelian picture of nature, which cohered closely with common sense and ordinary perceptual experience, was completely overthrown. Although we now take for granted the ideas that the earth revolves around the sun and that seemingly solid matter is composed of tiny particles, these concepts seemed equally counterintuitive, anxiety provoking, and at odds with our ancestors’ embodied experience of the world. In Losing...

The rise of modern science stirred up a mix of unease and exhilaration that profoundly influenced early modern English literature.

During the scientific revolution, the dominant Aristotelian picture of nature, which cohered closely with common sense and ordinary perceptual experience, was completely overthrown. Although we now take for granted the ideas that the earth revolves around the sun and that seemingly solid matter is composed of tiny particles, these concepts seemed equally counterintuitive, anxiety provoking, and at odds with our ancestors’ embodied experience of the world. In Losing Touch with Nature, Mary Thomas Crane examines the complex way that the new science’s threat to intuitive Aristotelian notions of the natural world was treated and reflected in the work of Edmund Spenser, Christopher Marlowe, William Shakespeare, and other early modern writers.

Crane breaks new ground by arguing that sixteenth-century ideas about the universe were actually much more sophisticated, rational, and observation-based than many literary critics have assumed. The earliest stages of the scientific revolution in England were most powerfully experienced as a divergence of intuitive science from official science, causing a schism between embodied human experience of the world and learned explanations of how the world works. This fascinating book traces the growing awareness of that epistemological gap through textbooks and natural philosophy treatises to canonical poetry and plays, presciently registering and exploring the magnitude of the human loss that accompanied the beginnings of modern science.

Reviews

Reviews

Losing Touch with Nature is a stimulating read. Crane gives clear explanations of complex philosophical and scientific subjects—particularly those which are unfamiliar to the modern mind—and sets out her argument lucidly. The view she advances is groundbreaking, providing a new perspective on an important period of history. Her book deserves a wide readership, both within academia and more generally, than just among literary historians.

Crane’s synchronic approach to multiple contexts related to science and literature resonates with current interdisciplinary views... Crane’s approach to her material is comprehensive and represents an important resource for research.

Of the books that I found most rewarding among this year's crop...I would flag Mary Thomas Crane's Losing Touch with Nature: Literature and the New Science in Sixteenth Century England.

About

Book Details

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments
1. Introduction
2. Aristotelian Naturalism and Its Discontents
3. Losing Touch with Nature
4. Spenser and the New Science
5. Shakespeare and New Forms of Nothing
6. Matter and Power
Epilogue

Acknowledgments
1. Introduction
2. Aristotelian Naturalism and Its Discontents
3. Losing Touch with Nature
4. Spenser and the New Science
5. Shakespeare and New Forms of Nothing
6. Matter and Power
Epilogue: What about Bacon?
Notes
Index

Author Bio
Mary Thomas Crane
Featured Contributor

Mary Thomas Crane

Mary Thomas Crane is the Thomas F. Rattigan Professor of English at Boston College. She is the author of Framing Authority: Sayings, Self, and Society in Sixteenth-Century England and Shakespeare’s Brain: Reading with Cognitive Theory.