Reviews
This impressive monograph will remain, I suspect, the most important resource on Romantic literature and science for many decades to come. This book changes how we view not only Romanticism but also the broader relationship between literature and science.
A fascinating read and discovery of literary and scientific interconnections.
For Sha, the concept of imagination is the key to unlocking relations between science and literature, since the faculty was viewed as central to scientific inquiry and literary creativity alike. Sha demonstrates that scientific thinkers, far from being antipathetic to the imagination, repeatedly indulged it and then tested its results experimentally. [I am] grateful for many penetrating insights in Sha's book.
Richard C. Sha's exemplary Imagination and Science in Romanticism centers the Romantic imagination within scientific ways of knowing. Each chapter contains intriguing and thorough discussions of science, and subtle, detailed readings of literary texts. There is a wealth of wonderfully collated material here and fine-grained contextualization; readers interested in Romanticism and science will find the individual chapters rewarding.
Richard Sha's Imagination and Science in Romanticism is required reading for anyone interested in the relations between Romantic science and literature.
Imagination and Science in Romanticism shifts the terms in which imaginative theory, in literature and science alike, can be understood.
The evidence across chapters from both literature and science fully substantiates Sha's central claim for an expanded sense of the imagination that includes Romantic science and reason along with it. Beyond a significant contribution to criticism of Romantic literature, this book is a rich resource and model for how to do interdisciplinary scholarship well.
An engaging account of how creative writers and scientists during the Romantic period understood the place of the imagination in their work. Sha's book makes a real contribution to our understanding of the extent to which Romantic writers responded to new ideas that were emerging in contemporary science. The chapters on Shelley and Blake, who both sought to combine visionary poetics with science, are especially well done.
It has taken generations to rectify the false split about art and science as radically distinct cultures. Richard Sha’s Imagination and Science in Romanticism occupies a noble place in the flow of scholarship aiming to topple the dichotomy.
In this book, Richard C. Sha explodes once and for all the myth of a Romantic hostility to science. By recovering the science in key Romantic texts, Sha restores the inherent materialism of the imagination, then as now regarded as an indispensable pathway for understanding the object world. A major contribution to scholarship.
In this ranging and learned study focused on key literary works by Blake, Coleridge, Mary Shelley, and a host of literary, philosophical, and scientific contemporaries, Sha explores the contested role of imagination in the arts and sciences of Romanticism. With energy and insight, Sha gathers disparate and challenging works, illustrating their relationships across generations, disciplines, and cultures. In this work, Sha also displays his own great gift: the 'capacity to imagine what we know,' the lack of which Shelley lamented.
Lucid and buoyant in its convictions, Richard Sha’s book is a salutary return to an often-dismissed term in Romantic studies. Sha’s knowledge and critical eye are evident as he asserts a Romantic imagination that is at once generative and regulative. This book will be a key player in any contemporary reflection on science, literature, and theories of the material.
In this work, Sha brilliantly reconceptualizes a classic concept of Romanticism: the imagination. Sha reveals how, by seeking to discipline the imagination, the various practices of Romantic literary and scientific authors linked the two fields in this period.
Richard Sha’s groundbreaking volume persuasively demonstrates how imagination played a vital role in both the sciences and the literature of the Romantic age, serving as a powerful bridge between these two apparently distant fields of human knowledge. The book is a milestone for scholars of the period and promises to remain an indispensable point of reference for many years to come.
Imagination and science in Romanticism are usually regarded separately. Sha brilliantly and convincingly demonstrates how closely they are, in fact, connected. It's Einstein, after all, who later said, 'Imagination is more important than knowledge.' Sha’s book is impressive not only for its forceful conceptual argument but also for the detailed empirical research and historical interpretation on which that argument is so imaginatively built.
A compelling account of how sciences generated an epistemology of imagination sensitive to dynamic forces and imponderable matter in a period when arts and science still enjoyed an intensely symbiotic relationship. Ranging across literature and connecting British and German science, this is a book Romanticists cannot afford to ignore.
Book Details
Acknowledgments
Introduction
Chapter One. Imagining Dynamic Matter: Percy Shelley, Prometheus Unbound, and the Chemistry and Physics of Matter
Chapter Two. William Blake and the Neurological
Acknowledgments
Introduction
Chapter One. Imagining Dynamic Matter: Percy Shelley, Prometheus Unbound, and the Chemistry and Physics of Matter
Chapter Two. William Blake and the Neurological Imagination: Romantic Science, Nerves, and the Emergent Self
Chapter Three. The Physiological Imagination: Coleridge’s Biographia
Chapter Four. Obstetrics and Embryology: Science and Imagination in Frankenstein
Notes
Works Cited
Index