Reviews
In clear, accessible, and often poetic language, González Stokas makes a significant contribution to discussions about decolonization and abolition in higher education and outlines a proposal for reparation as a path toward redressing the colonial violence of the university. Reparative Universities offers a critique of what many of us working in higher education sense: that often institutional actions made under the banner of diversity operate to reproduce the status quo rather than to interrupt or transform it.
An epistemic guide, an invitation to think with and think again, Reparative Universities argues, beautifully, for a 'movement into the unknown as the first undoing' of the university as a space of inequity—despite and sometimes because of 'diversity work.' This book exemplifies the 'reparative knowing' that it explores, ultimately arguing not for specific policies and procedures, but rather a radically different, imaginatively alive approach to thinking about antiracism and decoloniality in higher education.
Diversity work as it is practiced today in higher education won't abolish systemic racial and socioeconomic inequalities, Ariana González Stokas convincingly argues. We need to stop integrating students into a burning house. Reparative Universities will inspire an abolitionist reparative undoing of our current higher education systems, and poetic-political making of the liberatory institutions to come.
González Stokas shows how the university inherits and recreates epistemic injustice and why a managerial politics of diversity is not an adequate response. Her alternative—a reparative politics for the contemporary critical university—draws on decolonial Indigenous, Black, and Latinx contributions to contemporary critical theory while also finely distinguishing them. Reparative Universities is ambitious in its vision of a university education's capacity to disrupt and recreate social imaginaries. The author's approach is also a practical pursuit of how this translates into the implementable and the transformative.
The Reparative University provides a sorely needed argument for looking beyond DEI programs. It is positioned to address the fundamental issue of wealth inequality and structural racism rooted in our nation's founding. González Stokas provides an insightful response to the current questions in universities, legislatures, and courts, reminding us that we are living with a genocidal and willfully color-blind history. This thoughtful and necessary book joins the rising chorus of those piercing the veil to name American academia's complicity in the ongoing violence that built this nation.
Book Details
Prelude
Introduction
Part I: A Cabinet of Diversity
1. Object 1: Diversity Doesn't Work?
2. Object 2: Dominance
3. Object 3: From Wunderkammner to the Majors
4. Object 4: Patrol/Willy
5. Object 5
Prelude
Introduction
Part I: A Cabinet of Diversity
1. Object 1: Diversity Doesn't Work?
2. Object 2: Dominance
3. Object 3: From Wunderkammner to the Majors
4. Object 4: Patrol/Willy
5. Object 5: Accumulation/Difference that Makes No Difference
6. Object 6: Colorblindness/Federalist Paper no.6
7. Object 7: Partition/No. 76-811: A Grievance Not of Their Making
8. Object 8: The Morrill Acts: "The Land Grab University"
9. Afterthoughts
Part II: The Constellation of Reparation
10. Star 1: Attempted Remedies
11. Star 2: Outlines of Epistemic Reparation
12. Star 3: How is a University like a Light Switch?
13. Afterthoughts
Part III: Reparative Endeavors
14. Thread 1: Why Poetics?
15. Thread 2: Breath-Taking Landscapes: Place based interventions
16. Thread 3: Counter-space as the dramatization of a poetics of refusal
17. Thread 4: Gates/Gatekeeping
18. Thread 5: Unraveling Patrol
19. Thread 6: From Rank to Rhizome
20. Afterthoughts
Acknowledgements
Bibliography
Notes
Index